Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit c34efbbd authored by Lioncash's avatar Lioncash
Browse files

core: Make CPUBarrier a unique_ptr instead of a shared_ptr

This will always outlive the Cpu instances, since it's destroyed after
we destroy the Cpu instances on shutdown, so there's no need for shared
ownership semantics here.
parent b3cca34f
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
......@@ -139,10 +139,10 @@ struct System::Impl {
auto main_process = Kernel::Process::Create(kernel, "main");
kernel.MakeCurrentProcess(main_process.get());
cpu_barrier = std::make_shared<CpuBarrier>();
cpu_barrier = std::make_unique<CpuBarrier>();
cpu_exclusive_monitor = Cpu::MakeExclusiveMonitor(cpu_cores.size());
for (std::size_t index = 0; index < cpu_cores.size(); ++index) {
cpu_cores[index] = std::make_shared<Cpu>(cpu_exclusive_monitor, cpu_barrier, index);
cpu_cores[index] = std::make_shared<Cpu>(cpu_exclusive_monitor, *cpu_barrier, index);
}
telemetry_session = std::make_unique<Core::TelemetrySession>();
......@@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ struct System::Impl {
std::unique_ptr<Tegra::GPU> gpu_core;
std::shared_ptr<Tegra::DebugContext> debug_context;
std::shared_ptr<ExclusiveMonitor> cpu_exclusive_monitor;
std::shared_ptr<CpuBarrier> cpu_barrier;
std::unique_ptr<CpuBarrier> cpu_barrier;
std::array<std::shared_ptr<Cpu>, NUM_CPU_CORES> cpu_cores;
std::array<std::unique_ptr<std::thread>, NUM_CPU_CORES - 1> cpu_core_threads;
std::size_t active_core{}; ///< Active core, only used in single thread mode
......
......@@ -49,10 +49,9 @@ bool CpuBarrier::Rendezvous() {
return false;
}
Cpu::Cpu(std::shared_ptr<ExclusiveMonitor> exclusive_monitor,
std::shared_ptr<CpuBarrier> cpu_barrier, std::size_t core_index)
: cpu_barrier{std::move(cpu_barrier)}, core_index{core_index} {
Cpu::Cpu(std::shared_ptr<ExclusiveMonitor> exclusive_monitor, CpuBarrier& cpu_barrier,
std::size_t core_index)
: cpu_barrier{cpu_barrier}, core_index{core_index} {
if (Settings::values.use_cpu_jit) {
#ifdef ARCHITECTURE_x86_64
arm_interface = std::make_unique<ARM_Dynarmic>(exclusive_monitor, core_index);
......@@ -83,7 +82,7 @@ std::shared_ptr<ExclusiveMonitor> Cpu::MakeExclusiveMonitor(std::size_t num_core
void Cpu::RunLoop(bool tight_loop) {
// Wait for all other CPU cores to complete the previous slice, such that they run in lock-step
if (!cpu_barrier->Rendezvous()) {
if (!cpu_barrier.Rendezvous()) {
// If rendezvous failed, session has been killed
return;
}
......
......@@ -41,8 +41,8 @@ private:
class Cpu {
public:
Cpu(std::shared_ptr<ExclusiveMonitor> exclusive_monitor,
std::shared_ptr<CpuBarrier> cpu_barrier, std::size_t core_index);
Cpu(std::shared_ptr<ExclusiveMonitor> exclusive_monitor, CpuBarrier& cpu_barrier,
std::size_t core_index);
~Cpu();
void RunLoop(bool tight_loop = true);
......@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ private:
void Reschedule();
std::unique_ptr<ARM_Interface> arm_interface;
std::shared_ptr<CpuBarrier> cpu_barrier;
CpuBarrier& cpu_barrier;
std::shared_ptr<Kernel::Scheduler> scheduler;
std::atomic<bool> reschedule_pending = false;
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment